|
|
| Line 6: |
Line 6: |
| | * Dynamic number of modulation states for adaptive modulation radios (unlimited number) | | * Dynamic number of modulation states for adaptive modulation radios (unlimited number) |
| | * Dynamic number of radio configurations (unlimited number) | | * Dynamic number of radio configurations (unlimited number) |
| − | Improved transmission display options for adaptive modulation radios. | + | * Improved transmission display options for adaptive modulation radios. |
| − | Whole program memory management and stability improvements. | + | * Whole program memory management and stability improvements. |
| − | Option to delete .pl5 file when deleting links from network display restored. | + | * Option to delete .pl5 file when deleting links from network display restored. |
| − | Fixed possibility of crash on very specific path geometries that could occur when generating large studies. | + | * Fixed possibility of crash on very specific path geometries that could occur when generating large studies. |
| − | Blank site list elevations are update automatically after generate profile operation. (No Data Discrepancy dialog.) | + | * Blank site list elevations are update automatically after generate profile operation. (No Data Discrepancy dialog.) |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date March 16, 2016 ==
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Fixed memory leak that would occur when calculating diffraction loss with building ranges. Generating profiles using vector building clutter was especially susceptible to this bug.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | Interference calculation using XPIC. The interference reports for cases involving XPIC operation have been modified. The horizontally polarized receiver and the vertical polarized frequency are now considered as two separate cases. The previous version considered both H and V as the same receiver.
| + | |
| − | | + | |
| − | == Pathloss 5 - revision date February 28, 2016 ==
| + | |
